Cases 1 - 8 of 8
WBI Energy Transmission, Inc. v. 3.02 acres, more or less, located in Township 140 North, Range 50 West Section 33: NW/4 et al
as 3:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
WBI Energy Transmission, Inc.
Defendant:
3.02 acres, more or less, located in Township 140 North, Range 50 West Section 33: NW/4, 2.92 acres, more or less, located in Township 140 North, Range 50 West Section 33: N/2SW/4, 1.45 acres, more or less, located in Township 140 North, Range 50 West Section 33: S/2SW/4 with exception and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Fettig et al v. BNSF Railway Company et al
as 1:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
Ralph Fettig and Lori Fettig
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Torts to Land
WBI Energy Transmission, Inc. v. 192.90 rods, more or less, located in Township 151 North, Range 98 West Section 13: W/2NW/4 Section 14: E/2NE/4NE/4 McKenzie County, North Dakota et al
as 1:2021cv00140
Defendant:
Marcelline Rink, 165.91 rods, more or less, located in Township 149 North, Range 98 West Section 10: N/2SE/4, S/2SE4, S/2NE/4 McKenzie County, North Dakota, 191.01 rods, more or less, located in Township 158 North, Range 94 West Section 19: NW/4SW/4, W/2NW/4 Williams County, North Dakota and others
Plaintiff:
WBI Energy Transmission, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
WBI Energy Transmission, Inc. v. 8.55 rods, more or less, located in Township 140 N., Range 50 W., 5th P.M., Section 1: W1/2W1/2SE1/4, Cass County, North Dakota et al
as 3:2018cv00080
Plaintiff:
WBI Energy Transmission, Inc.
Defendant:
8.55 rods, more or less, located in Township 140 N., Range 50 W., 5th P.M., Section 1: W1/2W1/2SE1/4, Cass County, North Dakota, 160.52 rods, more or less, located in Township 140 N., Range 50 W., 5th P.M., Section 1: SW1/4, Cass County, North Dakota, 209.37 rods, more or less, located in Township 140 N., Range 50 W., 5th P.M., Section 15: SW1/4, Cass County, North Dakota and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
NHH Investor Group v. DFH Watford, LLC et al
as 4:2015cv00027
Plaintiff:
NHH Investor Group
Defendant:
DFH Watford, LLC , Kennedy Funding Financial, LLC, Ken Dardis and others
Cross_claimant:
Ken Dardis and DFH Watford, LLC
Cross_defendant:
New Harmony Homes & QB, LLC
Counter_claimant:
Ken Dardis and DFH Watford, LLC
Counter_defendant:
NHH Investor Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WBI Energy Transmission, Inc. v. 4.119 acres of land, more or less, lying in Township 150 North, Range 98 West, 5th P.M. Section 13: S1/2 NW1/4 and SW1/4 et al
as 4:2014cv00043
Plaintiff:
WBI Energy Transmission, Inc.
Defendant:
4.119 acres of land, more or less, lying in Township 150 North, Range 98 West, 5th P.M. Section 13: S1/2 NW1/4 and SW1/4, 1.559 acres of land, more or less, lying in Township 149 North, Range 98 West, 5th P.M. Section 14: S1/2NW1/4, 10.688 acres of land, more or less, lying in Township 149 North, Range 98 West, 5th P.M. Section 28: NW1/4NW1/4 Section 29: N1/2N1/2 Section 30: NE1/4 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Renner v. Chase Bank USA, N.A. et al
as 3:2014cv00039
Plaintiff:
Ruth Renner
Defendant:
Chase Bank USA, N.A. , Federal National Mortgage Association , JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alliance Pipeline L.P. v. 4.500 Acres of Land, More or Less, in the S/2NW/4 and SW/4 of Section 14, Township 162 North, Range 87 West, Renville County, North Dakota et al
as 4:2012cv00134
Plaintiff:
Alliance Pipeline L.P.
Defendant:
4.500 Acres of Land, More or Less, in the S/2NW/4 and SW/4 of Section 14, Township 162 North, Range 87 West, Renville County, North Dakota , 5.025 Acres of Land, More or Less, in the E/2 of Section 15, Township 162 North, Range 87 West, Renville County, North Dakota , 3.366 Acres of Land, More or Less, in the NW/4 of Section 21, Township 162 North, Range 87 West, Renville County, North Dakota and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
