Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Rabo Agrifinance, LLC v. Pamma et al
as 2:2024cv01392
Plaintiff:
Rabo Agrifinance, LLC
Defendant:
Sukhraj Pamma, Jaismin Pamma, Imperial Orchards and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
815 W 62nd, LLC v. Eugine Mays et al
as 2:2024cv01910
Plaintiff:
815 W 62nd, LLC
Defendant:
Eugine Mays, Tiffany Mays, Fernando Juarez and others
James May et al v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 5:2023cv00417
Plaintiff:
James May and Elizabeth May
Defendant:
Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC, FIRST FRANKLIN MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST, MORTGAGE LOAN ASSETBACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-FFC, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE, SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS TRUSTEE, SUC, DOES 1-10 Inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
(PS) Mincey et al v. Puila et al
as 2:2020cv00571
Defendant:
Betty M. Puila, Betty M Comeau, Trustee of the Betty M. Comeau Trust Dated May 7, 2019, United States and others
Plaintiff:
Linda A. Mason-Mincey and Willie James Mincey, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(UD)(PS) May v. Moore
as 2:2019cv02421
Plaintiff:
Patricia May
Defendant:
Tearon P. Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cape May Temecula Apartments, LLC v. Gregory Sutherland et al
as 5:2019cv00867
Defendant:
Does 1 to 10 inclusive and Gregory Sutherland
Plaintiff:
Cape May Temecula Apartments, LLC
Louden, LLC v. Mays et al
as 4:2017cv05215
Plaintiff:
Louden, LLC
Defendant:
Bunnie M. Mays and Michael Mays
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shetty v. Greenpoint MTA Trust 2006-AR2 et al
as 5:2017cv00808
Plaintiff:
Niki-Alexander Shetty
Defendant:
Greenpoint MTA Trust 2006-AR2, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. , JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ralph Partners II LLC v. Mark May et al
as 2:2016cv08272
Defendant:
Does and Mark May
Plaintiff:
Ralph Partners II LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
