Cases 1 - 10 of 19
HEARST PETTWAY et al v. LIMA ONE CAPITAL, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv01282
Plaintiff:
BENNIE R. HEARST PETTWAY, NOBLE CHIEF TIGER D. RAVEN-MELCHIZ EL and DANTE MAURTICE MOORE
Defendant:
LIMA ONE CAPITAL, LLC, HOF I REO 5 INC., FEIN, SUCH, KAHN & SHEPARD P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
335 Righters Ferry Road LP v. Minno & Wasko Architects and Planners, PC
as 2:2023cv01963
Plaintiff:
335 Righters Ferry Road LP
Defendant:
Minno & Wasko Architects and Planners, PC and Moore Consulting Engineers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
EL, TR v. MOORE
as 2:2022cv04062
Plaintiff:
ZEMIRAH MELODY CAROL RUTH EL, TR
Defendant:
BERNARD MOORE doing business as ADMINISTRATIVE CLERK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MOORE
as 2:2019cv01355
Defendant:
KIMBERLY A. MOORE
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. A PERMANENT EASEMENT OF 0.79 ACRES + AND A TEMPORARY EASEMENT OF 1.32 ACRES + IN MOORE TOWNSHIP, NORTHAMPTON, COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. J5-21-00007 et al
as 5:2019cv01131
Defendant:
A PERMANENT EASEMENT OF 0.79 ACRES + AND A TEMPORARY EASEMENT OF 1.32 ACRES + IN MOORE TOWNSHIP, NORTHAMPTON, COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. J5-21-7, TOWNSHIP OF MOORE, AND ALL UNKNOWN OWNERS and others
Plaintiff:
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. A TEMPORARY EASEMENT OF 0.63 ACRES + IN MOORE TOWNSHIP, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. H4-8-5 et al
as 5:2019cv01133
Defendant:
CONSTANCE C. JOHNSON, A TEMPORARY EASEMENT OF 0.63 ACRES + IN MOORE TOWNSHIP, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. H4-8-5 and ALL UNKNOWN OWNERS
Plaintiff:
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. PERMANENT EASEMENT OF 0.33 ACRES+TEMPORARY EASEMENT OF 0.08 ACRES+ IN MOORE TOWNSHIP, NORTHHAMPTION COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA,TAX PARCEL NO.H4-8-7-38 et al
as 5:2019cv01134
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., VERIZON PENNSYLVANIA INC., MOORE TOWNSHIP and others
Plaintiff:
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. A PERMANENT EASEMENT OF 2.87 ACRES + AND A TEMPORARY EASEMENT OF 4.43 ACRES + IN MOORE TOWNSHIP, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. H5-17-5 et al
as 5:2018cv00523
Plaintiff:
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
A PERMANENT EASEMENT OF 2.87 ACRES + AND A TEMPORARY EASEMENT OF 4.43 ACRES + IN MOORE TOWNSHIP, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. H5-17-5, A PERMANENT EASEMENT OF 0.18 ACRES + AND A TEMPORARY EASEMENT OF 0.14 ACRES + IN MOORE TOWNSHIP, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. H5-17-4, DAVID M. JAINDL and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. A PERMANENT EASEMENT OF 0.58 ACRES + AND A TEMPORARY EASEMENT OF 1.15 ACRES + IN MOORE TOWNSHIP, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. J5-9-2 et al
as 5:2018cv00520
Plaintiff:
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
A PERMANENT EASEMENT OF 0.58 ACRES + AND A TEMPORARY EASEMENT OF 1.15 ACRES + IN MOORE TOWNSHIP, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. J5-9-2, A PERMANENT EASEMENT OF 2.68 ACRES + AND A TEMPORARY EASEMENT OF 4.25 ACRES + IN MOORE TOWNSHIP, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. J5-10-10, LEHIGH GRAINS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. A PERMANENT EASEMENT OF 0.98 ACRES + AND A TEMPORARY EASEMENT OF 1.45 ACRES + IN MOORE TOWNSHIP, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. H5-17-1 et al
as 5:2018cv00518
Plaintiff:
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
A PERMANENT EASEMENT OF 0.98 ACRES + AND A TEMPORARY EASEMENT OF 1.45 ACRES + IN MOORE TOWNSHIP, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. H5-17-1, WILLIAM R. BUSKIRK, MARIAN M. BUSKIRK and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
