Cases 1 - 10 of 154
United States of America v. Additional Rights with Respect to an Existing Easement and Right-of-Way Over Land in Bedford County, Tennessee et al
as 4:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority and United States of America
Defendant:
Additional Rights, Etc., More or Less, in Bedford County Tennessee, and, Dr. John H. Gilmore, Vickie S. Gilmore and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945 Compensation for Land Condemnation
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. Kiser et al
as 3:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA upon the relation and for the use of the TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY, and United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant:
Jack A. Kiser, Gerda Kiser, Jack Allen Kiser and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945 Compensation for Land Condemnation
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority, v. An Easement and Right -of-Way over 1.64 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Knox County Tennessee, and Sonya R. Ogle, et al. et al
as 3:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA upon the relation and for the use of the TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY, and United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant:
An Easement and Right -of-Way over 1.64 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Knox County Tennessee, and Sonya R. Ogle, et al., Sonya R. Ogle, Mark A. Ogle and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945 Compensation for Land Condemnation
Nations Lending Corporation v. Stabler et al
as 3:2023cv00915
Plaintiff:
Nations Lending Corporation
Defendant:
Barbara A. Stabler, Tina E. Miller, Theodore G. Stabler, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1340 IRS: Custom Duties
Ringenberg v. United Sates of America
as 3:2023cv00295
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ringenberg
Defendant:
United States of America
United States of America v. An Easement and Right of Way over 6.26 Acres of Land, More or Less, In Sumner County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2023cv00665
Defendant:
William W. Connor, An Easement and Right of Way over 6.26 Acres of Land, More or Less, In Sumner County, Tennessee, Thomas Kelly Connor, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831 Tennessee Valley Authority Act
Regions Mortgage, Inc. v. Prater et al
as 4:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Regions Bank d/b/a Regions Mortgage and Regions Mortgage, Inc.
Defendant:
Regan D. Prater, The United States of America on behalf of the Internal Revenue Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1340 IRS: Custom Duties
Papworth v United States of America, et al.
as 3:2022cv00461
Plaintiff:
Brian Papworth
Defendant:
United States Department of Interior, United States, United States Department of the Interior and others
United States of America v. Easements and Rights-of-Way, et al. (TV2)
as 3:2022cv00032
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA upon the relation and for the use of the TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY, and United States of America
Defendant:
Easements and Rights-of-Way, Etc., et al., Easements and Rights-of-Way, Martin E. Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945 a Complaint in Condemnation
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. An Easement and Right-Of-Way, Etc., et al
as 3:2022cv00013
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA upon the relation and for the use of the TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY, and United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant:
AN EASEMENT AND RIGHT-OF-WAY, ETC., JAMES DARRELL WATSON, ET UX., An Easement and Right-Of-Way Over 0.49 Acre of Land, More or Less, In Monroe County, Tennessee, James Darrell Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945 a Complaint in Condemnation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
