Cases 1 - 7 of 7
GIBBLE et al v. SECRETARY OF U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
as 5:2022cv04992
Plaintiff:
JACQUES L. GIBBLE and VIRGINIA M. GIBBLE
Defendant:
SECRETARY OF U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC vs. PERMANENT EASTMENT OF 0.32 ACRES + AND A TEMPORARY EASEMENT OF 0.32 ACRES + IN WILLIAMS TOWNSHIP NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. N8-18-4
as 5:2018cv00511
Plaintiff:
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
A PERMANENT EASTMENT OF 0.32 ACRES + AND A TEMPORARY EASEMENT OF 0.32 ACRES + IN WILLIAMS TOWNSHIP NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. N8-18-4, BRIAN MONAHAN, HAROLD A. MELCHOR and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
UGI Sunbury LLC v A Permanent Easement
as 3:2016cv00799
Plaintiff:
UGI Sunbury LLC
Defendant:
A Permanent Easement, Edgar A. DeRemer, Jr., Diane M. DeRemer and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RETTGER
as 1:2013cv00144
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
VIRGINIA M. RETTGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. et al v. APF VIRGINIA L.P.
as 2:2013cv02100
Plaintiff:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-5
Defendant:
APF VIRGINIA L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RISINGER et al
as 1:2011cv00135
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LAURA RISINGER, LINDA MARCONI, A. PHILIP BAUERLE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. UGI UTILITIES, INC. et al
as 5:2008cv00334
Plaintiff:
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY and LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
UGI UTILITIES, INC., SPECIALIZED TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., ITRON, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
