Cases 91 - 100 of 176
FOOTE et al v. WILLIAMS
as 1:2016cv02530
Plaintiff:
SANDRA FOOTE and ESTATE OF LESTER FOOTE
Defendant:
JANE E WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DIBENEDETTO et al v. IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY et al
as 1:2016cv02429
Defendant:
IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY and ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Plaintiff:
DAVID DIBENEDETTO , DIANE MARTIN , LAURA PINATTI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
WILLIAMS v. VETERANS AFFAIRS ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2016cv02062
Plaintiff:
DAMOND LEE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
VETERANS AFFAIRS ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
WALLACE v. UNITED HOSPITALITY SOLUTIONS, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv01697
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WALLACE
Defendant:
UNITED HOSPITALITY SOLUTIONS, LLC and RENAISSANCE HOTEL OPERATING COMPANY
Cross_claimant:
RENAISSANCE HOTEL OPERATING COMPANY
Cross_defendant:
UNITED HOSPITALITY SOLUTIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RIES v. MALAYSIAN AIRLINE SYSTEM BERHAD
as 1:2016cv01061
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CAMPBELL RIES
Defendant:
MALAYSIAN AIRLINE SYSTEM BERHAD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RARDON et al v. HOLLAND, LP et al
as 1:2016cv00539
Plaintiff:
LYLE G RARDON and CAROLYN A RARDON
Defendant:
HOLLAND, LP, JUSTIN L MCFERRIN, WILLIAM DAVIS, SR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STROUD v. WMATA
as 1:2016cv00370
Defendant:
WMATA
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM STROUD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WILLIAMS v. WMATA
as 1:2016cv00381
Defendant:
WMATA
Plaintiff:
JOHN WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KARCHER et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2016cv00232
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Plaintiff:
KARCHER, ERIKA NEUMAN, LINDA JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1602
NAHARAJA v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD et al
as 1:2016cv00024
Plaintiff:
KUMAR NAHARAJA
Defendant:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, RICHARD GRIFFIN, JR., GARY SHINNERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
