Torts - Injury Cases filed in Maryland
Cases 101 - 110 of 296
DeLorme et al v. Ampey et al
as 8:2017cv03621
Plaintiff: Gilbert E. DeLorme and Margaret DeLorme
Defendant: Luther L. Ampey, III, Bernard J. Rogus, Chesapeake Urology Associates, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morgan et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2017cv03377
Plaintiff: Gloria E Morgan and Kenneth Morgan
Defendant: Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
English v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 1:2017cv03067
Plaintiff: Ida E. English
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dawson et al v. Cargo Trailer Sales, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02915
Plaintiff: Jeffrey R. Dawson and Quiana E. Dawson
Defendant: Cargo Trailer Sales, Inc. , Paul Woglom and Vivian M. Costa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Montrose v. Groundlease Mgmt, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv02786
Plaintiff: Lennox E. Montrose
Defendant: Groundlease Mgmt, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marshall v. DeVaughn et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv02630
Plaintiff: Wayne E. Marshall
Defendant: Monica DeVaughn and Gordon B. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kusky et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2017cv02521
Defendant: Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff: Jerold E. Kusky and Carolyn D. Kusky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tizer v. Esposito et al
as 1:2017cv02303
Plaintiff: Frank Tizer
Defendant: Alfred E. Esposito, United States Postal Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364
Clayton et al v. Lodovico et al
as 1:2017cv02086
Defendant: Daniel R Lodovico and Joshua E Lewis
Plaintiff: Christopher Clayton, Sr. and C.C., Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Ashe v. Wilson
as 8:2017cv02077
Plaintiff: Keith Alexander Ashe
Defendant: Deborah E. Wilson
Movant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?