Cases 131 - 140 of 1,155
PIERCE v. PIERCE et al
as 2:2022cv00086
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL MADIGAN PIERCE
Defendant:
THOMAS MADIGAN PIERCE, ANDREW NEALE PIERCE and HM PAYSON & CO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
VIOLETTE v. NEWMARKET HEALTH PRODUCTS LLC
as 1:2022cv00057
Plaintiff:
GREGORY PAUL VIOLETTE
Defendant:
NEWMARKET HEALTH PRODUCTS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
VIOLETTE v. PEPSI-COLA
as 1:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
GREGORY PAUL VIOLETTE
Defendant:
PEPSI-COLA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
VIOLETTE v. INTERBAKE FOODS LLC
as 1:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
GREGORY PAUL VIOLETTE
Defendant:
INTERBAKE FOODS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WHITNEY v. CASSIDY et al
as 1:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
SCOTT WHITNEY
Defendant:
MARK D CASSIDY and MEDUXNEKAEG RAMBLERS SNOWMOBILE CLUB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MANTER v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
LLEWELLYN C MANTER
Defendant:
SETH A MCLEAN-WILLIAMS, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409 Postal Service
COREY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
JUNE COREY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
HIGGINS et al v. HUHTAMAKI OYJ et al
as 1:2021cv00369
Defendant:
SAPPI NORTH AMERICA INC, HUHTAMAKI OYJ, HUHTAMAKI INC and others
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE HIGGINS, PENELOPE HIGGINS, ASHLEY GOOLDRUP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REARDON v. LOWES COMPANIES INC
as 1:2021cv00362
Plaintiff:
NATHAN REARDON
Defendant:
LOWES COMPANIES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PATTS v. SHAWS SUPERMARKET INC
as 2:2021cv00350
Plaintiff:
DONNA PATTS
Defendant:
SHAWS SUPERMARKET INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
