Cases 151 - 160 of 5,163
RUHOSHA v. MAINE MEDICAL CENTER et al
as 1:2023cv02218
Plaintiff:
JEAN PAUL RUHOSHA
Defendant:
MAINE MEDICAL CENTER and MEDSTAR GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
MASON v. AMERICAN PROSPECT, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02238
Plaintiff:
CHATAQUOA NICOLE MASON
Defendant:
AMERICAN PROSPECT, INC. and JULIANNE MCSHANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
THOMPSON v. SAFEWAY, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv01995
Plaintiff:
Joseph Thompson
Defendant:
SAFEWAY/ALBERSONS CO., WOLF PROFESSIONAL SECURITY, INC., Unknown Security Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DARDEN v. PEARSON et al
as 1:2023cv02185
Plaintiff:
TARIA DASHAWN DARDEN
Defendant:
LILLIAN GLADYS PEARSON and WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
MORRIS et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2023cv01941
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. MORRIS, JESSE URENA, BRIANNE CROOKS and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
BOWEN v. HENKEL CONSUMER GOODS INC.
as 1:2023cv01981
Plaintiff:
FEKRA BOWEN
Defendant:
HENKEL CONSUMER GOODS INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
HALL v. BIDEN
as 1:2023cv02290
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
HALL v. HARRIS
as 1:2023cv02289
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant:
KAMALA HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
HALL v. U.S. POSTAL INSPECTION SERVICE
as 1:2023cv02189
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant:
U.S. POSTAL INSPECTION SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
HALL v. WRAY
as 1:2023cv01909
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
