Cases 11 - 20 of 29
DEVINE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 2:2012cv03280
Plaintiff:
THOMAS DEVINE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY , AURORA PUMP COMPANY, BIRD CORPORATION and others
Cross_claimant:
UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Cross_defendant:
UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, 3M COMPANY, AURORA PUMP COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DEVINE v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILTY TRUST
as 2:2011cv56001
Plaintiff:
PATRICK J. DEVINE
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILTY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MILLER et al v. DEVINE et al
as 2:2011cv06220
Plaintiff:
ROSEANNE MILLER and LEWIS SMALL
Defendant:
RICHARD DEVINE and BARBARA DEVINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEVINE v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv43956
Plaintiff:
RYAMOND F. DEVINE
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
DEVINE et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv64342
Plaintiff:
ROBERT D. DEVINE and MARGARET DEVINE
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FRISCHOLZ et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2011cv00507
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM FRISCHOLZ and DENISE FRISCHOLZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH PHYSICIANS , JOHN J. MOOSSY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Smith v. Peterkin et al
as 3:2011cv00619
Plaintiff:
Ackalee Smith
Defendant:
Jermaine Peterkin and Deanna Devine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WHITTAKER et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv31101
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC F/K/A NATIONAL GYPSUM CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
DEVINE v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv54252
Plaintiff:
VIRGIL M. DEVINE
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
DEVINE v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv52202
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M. DEVINE
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
