Cases 11 - 20 of 61
Smith v. Sysco Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv00940
Plaintiff:
Cory Smith
Defendant:
Sysco Corporation, Sygma Network Inc, Zurich American Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Allison v. Kim
as 2:2021cv00815
Plaintiff:
Daniel Allison
Defendant:
Soon Kim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Michaels v. AAT Trucking, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00764
Plaintiff:
Daniel Michaels
Defendant:
AAT Trucking, LLC and Juan Duran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Souza et al v. ABQ Liquors, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00538
Plaintiff:
Alana Souza, Alana Campos, Jessica Burciaga and others
Defendant:
ABQ Liquors, LLC doing business as Posh Nightclub and Does 1 through 20
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Mortensen v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv00459
Defendant:
Eugene Martinez, The Rio Rancho Police Department, The City of Rio Rancho and others
Plaintiff:
Tucker Mortensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hugo v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv00305
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hugo
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Feinmark v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv01079
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Daniel Feinmark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Baxley v. Ridout et al
as 2:2020cv00861
Defendant:
Ali, M.D. Akbar, Ridout, III, M.D. L. Daniel, Roswell Hospital Corporation d/b/a Eastern New Mexico Medical Center and others
Plaintiff:
Toby Baxley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Serna v. Family Dollar Stores of New Mexico, Inc et al.
as 2:2020cv00090
Defendant:
Family Dollar Stores of New Mexico, Inc, Jane and John Does and Danielle Nicholson
Plaintiff:
Estella Serna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Suazo v. Taos Living Center, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00673
Defendant:
Parentis Salus Provideo, LLC, Taos Living Center, LLC, Paul Reid and others
Plaintiff:
Danny Suazo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
