Cases 11 - 20 of 77
Chisolm v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv01647
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Chisolm
Defendant:
Biomet Inc and John Does 1-10
Zurek v. American Express et al
as 2:2014cv00141
Plaintiff:
Ron Zurek
Defendant:
American Express and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Neal et al v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv00758
Plaintiff:
Lena Neal and Charlie Neal
Defendant:
Biomet Inc, Biomet Orthopedics LLC, Biomet US Reconstruction LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Antler v. Biomet Orthopedics LLC
as 3:2014cv00754
Plaintiff:
Steven J Antler
Defendant:
Biomet Orthopedics LLC, Biomet Inc and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bland et al v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv00523
Plaintiff:
Henry Ray Bland and Mary Bland
Defendant:
Biomet, Inc. , Biomet Orthopedics, LLC , Biomet U.S. Reconstruction, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WAKLEY et al v. FRONTERA PRODUCE, LTD et al
as 1:2014cv00135
Defendant:
ALDI, INC., CH ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC., FRONTERA PRODUCE, LTD. and others
Plaintiff:
K. P., DAVID PACIOREK and MICHELLE WAKLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kirvin v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2014cv00024
Plaintiff:
Janice L Kirvin
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, DePuy Inc, Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Krape v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2013cv01381
Plaintiff:
Louerma Krape
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, DePuy Inc, Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bean v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2013cv01375
Plaintiff:
Glenda Ann Bean
Defendant:
Biomet Inc , Biomet Orthopedics LLC , Biomet US Reconstruction LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Durren v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2013cv01230
Plaintiff:
Randy Durren
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, DePuy Inc, Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
