Cases 11 - 20 of 350
BENTON et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv05615
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
CARYL BENTON and FLOYD BENTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FLOYD et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv02389
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
ROGER FLOYD and VIVIAN FLOYD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
WILLIAMS v. MEYJES et al
as 5:2019cv00035
Defendant:
MAX DEHON, WILLIAM MCCARTHY, SCOTT MCAVOY and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER AND DIANE WILLIAMS, DIANE WILLIAMS and CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones et al v. Merck & Co. Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv20005
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP, MERCK & CO INC, MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
Celeste Jones and Floyd Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DIXON v. FLOYD
as 2:2018cv00601
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM L. DIXON
Defendant:
MICHAEL W. FLOYD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FLOYD v. LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv01376
Plaintiff:
JOYCE OLLIE FLOYD
Defendant:
LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC. , DAVE SWAGGER and RANDOLPH SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FLOYD et al v. AMTRAK NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP.
as 2:2015cv05792
Plaintiff:
EUGENE FLOYD and BARBARA FLOYD
Defendant:
AMTRAK NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JULIANO v. FLOYD
as 2:2015cv04018
Plaintiff:
PAUL JULIANO
Defendant:
SARAYA FLOYD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
FLOYD v. LITTLER et al
as 5:2014cv03682
Plaintiff:
ISRAEL J. FLOYD
Defendant:
EDWARD LITTLER and MARGARET V. LITTLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
FORTUNE et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC. et al
as 2:2013cv05879
Plaintiff:
RONALD FORTUNE , MICHAEL HALL , MARY CLAYBORN and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC. and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
