Cases 11 - 20 of 5,103
FENNEN v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86301
Defendant:
GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, CRANE COMPANY, JOHN CRANE and others
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS JOSEPH FENNEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CROSS v. ABEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv82899
Plaintiff:
CHARLES W CROSS
Defendant:
ABEX CORPORATION , GAF CORPORATION , ABEX INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CANNON v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86395
Defendant:
3M, ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC., VIACOM, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CHIQUITA CANNON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEZOTTE v. CONGOLEUM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv86988
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., AEARO COMPANY, CONTINENTAL BEVERAGE PACKAGING, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ALICE LEZOTTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HENDRICKSON v. KEENE CORP et al
as 2:2010cv67043
Plaintiff:
DONALD HENDRICKSON
Defendant:
KEENE CORP , NATIONAL GPSUM CO , PFIZER INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALKER v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86382
Defendant:
D.B. RILEY, INC., ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC., MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
MESHONA WALKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JACKSON v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86323
Defendant:
BURNS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION, MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC., GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TOMMY L. JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86327
Defendant:
GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC., AVENTIS CROPSCIENCE USA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
PEGGY JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BEATTY v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86350
Defendant:
D.B. RILEY, INC., UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, OAKFABCO, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
MARY FRANCES BEATTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DRISKELL v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86393
Defendant:
JOHN CRANE, D.B. RILEY, INC., OAKFABCO, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
MARIE DRISKELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
