Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Municipality of Caguas v. Purdue Pharma Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv01814
Defendant:
McKESSON CORPORATION, RICHARD S. SACKLER, ANDA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
MUNICIPALITY OF CAGUAS, PUERTO RICO and Municipality of Caguas
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Municipality of Loiza, Puerto Rico v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 3:2017cv02371
Plaintiff:
Municipality of Loiza, Puerto Rico
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma, Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Municipality of Guayanilla v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 3:2017cv02364
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma, Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Municipality of Guayanilla
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Municipality of Guayama, Puerto Rico v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 3:2017cv02356
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma, Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Municipality of Guayama, Puerto Rico
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Torres-Ortiz et al v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01746
Plaintiff:
Annette Torres-Ortiz, Elizabeth Marquez, Evelyn Maldonado and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson International , Ethicon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Aguayo-Porrata et al v. Mc-Neill-PPC, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv01975
Plaintiff:
Carlos Aguayo-Porrata , Conjugal Partnership Aguayo-Porrata , Carlos Javier Aguayo-Gonzalez and others
Defendant:
Mc-Neill-PPC, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ortiz v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv02193
Plaintiff:
Domingo Ortiz
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
