Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Makhlouf et al v. Curtis et al
as 1:2010cv00198
Plaintiff:
Linda K. Makhlouf
Defendant:
Jamaal A. Curtis and PI&I Motor Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Teel v. Davol Inc et al
as 1:2010cv03227
Plaintiff:
Sharon K Teel
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C R Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bailey v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00145
Plaintiff:
Sammy K. Bailey
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Denning v. Davol, Inc et al
as 1:2009cv00630
Plaintiff:
William K. Denning
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Carter v. Davol, Inc. et al .
as 1:2009cv03038
Plaintiff:
Cherie K. Carter and Cherie K. Carter
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Brad, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Jowais et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02967
Plaintiff:
Peter A. Jowais, Peter A. Jowais, Peter A. Jowais and others
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kroskob v. AAMCO Transmissons, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00396
Defendant:
Eaton Corporation, Goodrich Corporation, Wheth Holdings Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Kroskob and Lisa Kroskob
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cone v. Acgo Corp. et al
as 1:2009cv00394
Defendant:
American Biltrite Inc., United Gilsonite Laboratories, Bird, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Arletta Cone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Daniels et al v. Davol, Inc et al
as 1:2009cv00324
Plaintiff:
Mary K. Daniels, Mary K. Daniels, Mary K. Daniels and others
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dern v. Bower Hill Associates et al
as 1:2008cv00486
Plaintiff:
Shannon K. Dern and Shannon K. Dern
Defendant:
Bower Hill Associates, Bower Hill Associates, Windsor Property Management Company and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
