Torts - Injury Cases filed in Delaware
Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Baldonado et al v. Arvinmeritor Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00833
Defendant: Arvinmeritor Inc., BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc., CNH America LLC and others
Cross Defendant: Daimler Trucks North America LLC, Paccar Inc., Eaton Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Michael Baldonado and Virginia Baldonado
Cross Claimant: CNH Industrial America LLC (fka CNH America LLC), IMO Industries Inc., Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Borders et al v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 1:2013cv00612
Plaintiff: Bettie Borders and Kenneth Borders
Defendant: 84 Lumber Company , Acme Engineering Products Inc., Advance Auto Parts Inc. and others
Cross_claimant: 84 Lumber Company , The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc. and others
Cross_defendant: AII Acquisitions LLC, Acme Engineering Products Inc., Advance Auto Parts Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Hicks v. The Boeing Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00393
Plaintiff: John Hicks
Defendant: The Boeing Company , BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc., Crown Cork & Seal Company Inc. and others
Cross_claimant: General Dynamics Corporation , General Electric Company and Honeywell International Inc.
Cross_defendant: General Dynamics Corporation , BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc., Crown Cork & Seal Company Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Johnson et al v. Advance Auto Parts Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00345
Defendant: BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc., Georgia Pacific LLC, Goodrich Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Charles Johnson and Ruby Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Patterson Mims et al v. 84 Lumber Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00298
Plaintiff: Patterson Mims and Vera Mims
Defendant: 84 Lumber Company , AO Smith Corporation, Advance Auto Parts Inc. and others
Cross_claimant: Cleaver-Brooks Inc. and Ericsson Inc.
Cross_defendant: Cleaver-Brooks Inc., 84 Lumber Company , AGCO Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Carriveau v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2013cv00198
Plaintiff: Donna Carriveau
Defendant: 3M Company, 84 Lumber Company , Borg Warner Corporation and others
Cross_claimant: 84 Lumber Company , Union Carbide Corporation, Certainteed Corporation and others
Cross_defendant: 84 Lumber Company , 3M Company, Borg Warner Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
McCrocklin et al v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 1:2012cv01483
Plaintiff: William M. McCrocklin and Judith M. McCrocklin
Defendant: 84 Lumber Company, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, American Biltrite Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Oates et al v. AO Smith Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv01229
Plaintiff: Robert Oates, Sr. and Emmaline Oates
Defendant: AO Smith Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, American Biltrite Inc. and others
Cross_claimant: Peerless Industries Inc. , Compudyne Corporation , Kentile Floors Inc. and others
Cross_defendant: Peerless Industries Inc. , AO Smith Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Patterson Mims et al v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 1:2012cv01227
Defendant: American Biltrite Inc., CNH America LLC, HB Smith Company Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Patterson Mims and Vera Mims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Davis et al v. Ace Hardware Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv01185
Defendant: BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc., Georgia Pacific LLC, Honeywell International Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Harry A. Davis and Madonna S. Davis
Cross Defendant: Peerless Industries
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?