Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Nelson v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. et al
as 1:2019cv06847
Defendant:
RITE AID CORPORATION, TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC, MAJOR PHARMACEUTICALS and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Nelson
In Re:
VALSARTAN N-NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE (NDMA) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VALSARTAN LOSARTAN AND IRBESARTAN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
as 1:2019md02875
Defendant:
TEVA INDUSTRIES LTD., HETERO USA INC., CAMBER PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DOMINIC STIMMA, JYNONA GAIL LEE, MARGOTH STRAND and others
In Re:
VALSARTAN N-NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE (NDMA) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FARRA et al v. ACME MARKETS, INC. et al
as 3:2018cv13432
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
RITE AID OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, RITE AID CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
JERRY FARRA and DONNA FARRA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PIPER et al v. RITE AID CORPORATION et al
as 3:2018cv08490
Plaintiff:
LINDA PIPER and VICTOR PIPER
Defendant:
RITE AID CORPORATION, RITE AID OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DE ARRIBA v. RITE AID CORPORATION et al
as 2:2018cv00511
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO DE ARRIBA
Defendant:
RITE AID CORPORATION, JOHN DOES 1-5 and ABC COMPANIES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MASON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv04556
Plaintiff:
DONNA MASON
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , IMERYS TAC AMERICA, INC ("IMERYS TALC"), JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NEMETH v. ETHEX CORPORATION et al
as 3:2010cv03738
Plaintiff:
FRED NEMETH
Defendant:
ETHEX CORPORATION , KV PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY , RITE AID CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
