Cases 191 - 200 of 249
Doe v. The Winner Group et al
as 2:2012cv12210
Plaintiff:
William Doe
Defendant:
The Winner Group and Refong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SANDLES v. Clay et al
as 2:2012cv12117
Plaintiff:
John Eric SANDLES
Defendant:
Eric L. Clay , John M. Rodger , James L. Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sandles v. Chastang et al
as 2:2012cv11721
Plaintiff:
John Eric Sandles
Defendant:
Rita Chastang , Sarah Cohen , George Steeh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Richko v. Wayne County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2012cv11232
Plaintiff:
Linda Richko
Defendant:
Wayne County Sheriff's Department, Wayne, County of and JOHN DOEs 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Salser et al v. Dyncorp International, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv10960
Plaintiff:
Patricia Salser , Brandin Pope , Kevin Pope, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Dyncorp International, Inc., Dyncorp International, LLC, Kyle Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chahine et al v. Walmart Stores East, L.P.
as 2:2011cv15518
Plaintiff:
Teresa Chahine and Maher Chahine
Defendant:
John Doe and Walmart Stores East, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Redd v. PTS of America, LLC
as 4:2011cv15517
Defendant:
PTS of America, LLC and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Jim Henry Redd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aday et al v. Warren, City of et al
as 2:2011cv15325
Plaintiff:
Franklin Aday, Sr. , Robert Aday and Floydia L Morton
Defendant:
Warren, City of , Mark O'Kray , John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Victor v. Roscommon County Probation Department et al
as 1:2011cv15143
Plaintiff:
Kim L Victor
Defendant:
Roscommon County Probation Department, Roscommon County Friend of the Court, George H. Foust and others
Dean v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv01113
Plaintiff:
Shernettia Dean
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. , John Doe #1 and John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
