Cases 21 - 30 of 196
United States of America v. Sharpe et al
as 5:2023cv00353
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Richard T. Sharpe and Sherry J. Peele
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Knuth v. Bluefin Sportfishing, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
Clinton E. Knuth
Defendant:
Bluefin Sportfishing, Inc., Charles J. Parker and Laura Burroughs Parker
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Ford v. Nash County General Hospital, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Jarred J. Ford
Defendant:
Nash County General Hospital, Inc., Madjimbaye Charels Namde and Alec Lauren Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 dd Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act
Wiley v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 7:2023cv00817
Plaintiff:
Craig J. Wiley
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Orue v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00277
Plaintiff:
John J. Orue
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Pingree v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
Alan J. Pingree
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
LaFollette et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 7:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
William J. LaFollette and Alva Inez LaFollette
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Ampedu v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
J. A. and Laurencia Ampedu
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nickels v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Clara J. Nickels
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Young v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00148
Plaintiff:
Mary J. Young
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
