Cases 21 - 27 of 27
AMATO v. KANE FREIGHT LINES et al
as 1:2013cv05542
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. AMATO
Defendant:
KANE FREIGHT LINES , G. JOHNSON TRUCKING , JPG TRANSPORT and others
Cross_claimant:
JPG TRANSPORT , JOSEPH M. GALLAGHER and G. JOHNSON TRUCKING
Cross_defendant:
JOHN J. AMATO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
IN RE: PLAVIX PRODUCT LIABILITY AND MARKETING LITIGATION
as 3:2013cv02418
Plaintiff:
Boyce Glenn, MYRNA PETERS, ROSE JOSEPH and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
RALPH T. HARDEN, PAMELA L. BEAZLEY, THOMAS E. MAY and others
Defendant:
ANITA ROY, SUSIE FARMER, BEATRICE COFFINO and others
Not Classified By Court:
MILTON BRODY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KANE et al v. SYMS, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv00062
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KANE and MARGARET KANE
Defendant:
SYMS, INC., TRINITY PLACE HOLDINGS, INC. , SYMS OUTLET STORE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
KANE v. THOMAS et al
as 1:2010cv00970
Plaintiff:
EDWARD M. KANE
Defendant:
DEWEY T. THOMAS, RON CAMPBELL, CROMARTIE TRANSPORTATION LINES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
LIFE PARTNERS HOLDING, INC., et al v. KANE
as 2:2009cv05106
Plaintiff:
LIFE PARTNERS HOLDING, INC. and BRIAN PARDO
Defendant:
PHILLIP KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
DRIVE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. KANE et al
as 2:2009cv01680
Plaintiff:
DRIVE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY and DRIVE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY as subrogee of Sheena H. Harris
Defendant:
BRIAN KANE, YRC, INC., OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
KANE et al v. BIOMEDICAL TISSUE SERVICES LTD.
as 2:2007cv00114
Plaintiff:
DARCY A. KANE
Defendant:
BIOMEDICAL TISSUE SERVICES LTD., MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA INC, SPINALGRAFT TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
