Cases 21 - 30 of 124
Weiland v. Crane Co.
as 1:2015cv00029
Plaintiff:
Weiland, Jerome E. Weiland and Carole L. Weiland
Defendant:
Crane Co., Zurn Industries, Inc., Bucyrus International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kroll v. Pfisterer et al
as 1:2015cv00024
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth L. Kroll
Defendant:
John M. Pfisterer and Suzanne M. Pfisterer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Russo v. Beautyman Alvstad, LLP et al
as 1:2014cv00242
Plaintiff:
W. Mark Russo
Defendant:
Beautyman Alvstad, LLP , Beautyman Associates, P.C. , Stephen L. Alvstad and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hennemuth v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03855
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L. Hennemuth
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Payne et al v. Davol Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv03850
Plaintiff:
Derrick A. Payne and Joy L. Payne
Defendant:
DAVOL INC. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crawford et al v. Davol Inc et al
as 1:2013cv03782
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lee Crawford , Teresa L Crawford and Kate-Lynne Ruth Crawford
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bock et al v. St. Onge et al
as 1:2013cv00305
Plaintiff:
Patricia A. Bock and John R. Bock
Defendant:
Ashley L. St. Onge and Darlene L. St. Onge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Wade v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv00074
Plaintiff:
Lillie Wade
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Woonsocket Prescription Center, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kinsella, M.D. v. Weber
as 1:2011cv00207
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Kinsella, M.D.
Defendant:
Amelia L. Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brunsvold v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv03601
Plaintiff:
David L. Brunsvold
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pip
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
