Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Freeman v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01038
Plaintiff:
Norris W. Freeman
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Freeman v. Durrani, M.D. et al
as 1:2016cv00127
Plaintiff:
Julie Freeman
Defendant:
Abubakar Atiq Durrani, M.D. , Center For Advanced Spine Technologies, Inc. , Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Freeman v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02062
Plaintiff:
Beth Freeman
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Freeman v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01383
Plaintiff:
Nancy Freeman
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Freeman v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01414
Plaintiff:
Tracey Lyn Freeman
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dornon v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv02437
Plaintiff:
Walter Freeman Dornon
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Byers v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01300
Plaintiff:
Jacob Freeman Byers
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sunkin v. Cloke et al
as 5:2014cv00407
Plaintiff:
Christopher T. Sunkin
Defendant:
Alec T. Cloke, Craig A. Hall, Nicholas Kamenszky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Freeman v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company
as 2:2013cv01103
Plaintiff:
David Freeman
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. CSX Transportaion, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00782
Plaintiff:
FREEMAN MOORE
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc. , Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company and CHESSIE SYSTEM RAILROADS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
