Cases 21 - 30 of 160
HOLMES et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv03628
Plaintiff:
ALBERT J. HOLMES and MARGARET A. SIDARIS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , MX CENTURY REAL ESTATE, LLC and JOHN WEI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BAILEY v. BAYER CORP. et al
as 2:2016cv02154
Plaintiff:
YOLONDA BAILEY , CRYSTAL CAMPOS , JOLENE DURAN and others
Defendant:
BAYER CORP., BAYER HEALTHCARE, LLC, BAYER ESSURE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HOLMES et al v. WHITELAND INVESTORS, LP et al
as 2:2016cv01802
Plaintiff:
APRIL HOLMES and NORMAN HOLMES
Defendant:
WHITELAND INVESTORS, LP and BPG MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
SMITH-HOLMES et al v. EMERSON, INC.
as 2:2015cv01081
Plaintiff:
LYNNDORA SMITH-HOLMES and FRANKLIN HOLMES
Defendant:
EMERSON, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOLMES v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv02246
Plaintiff:
BARBARA HOLMES
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOLMES et al v. GOYA FOODS, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv02464
Plaintiff:
WARREN W. HOLMES and CAROL HOLMES
Defendant:
GOYA FOODS, INC. and JOSE V. CASIANO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MOREHEAD et al v. MCKEESON CORPORATION
as 2:2014cv01989
Plaintiff:
MARK MOREHEAD , CLARA ACREY , LUDWIG ANDERSON and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOLMES et al v. TAN et al
as 2:2014cv01868
Plaintiff:
MARION HOLMES and SANDRA HOLMES
Defendant:
KEVIN TAN and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOLMES v. EVANS et al
as 2:2014cv01728
Plaintiff:
DENNIS HOLMES
Defendant:
CARLA EVANS , BRIAN EVANS and MARK BATEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle
HOLMES v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
as 2:2014cv00374
Plaintiff:
LARRY E. HOLMES
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
