Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Rigney v. Thorpe et al
as 2:2015cv00186
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Rigney, Sr.
Defendant:
Stephen Martin Thorpe , Vulcan Materials Company and Shannon Malbon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Weidman v. Exxon Mobil Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv00501
Plaintiff:
Richard C. Weidman
Defendant:
Exxon Mobil Corporation , Clarion Ellis Johnson , Jeffrey Woodbury and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Fraud
Martin v. Perciful et al
as 2:2013cv00191
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Martin
Defendant:
Gary Perciful and The Sygma Network, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Martin, et al. v. Chava
as 7:2013cv00018
Defendant:
Samyukta Chava, MD
Plaintiff:
Ann Wall Martin and Richard Floyd Wall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
J. P. et al v. Martin et al
as 4:2012cv00014
Plaintiff:
J. P. and Debra Patrick
Defendant:
Donna Martin, United States Postal Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Martin v. Cedar Fair Southwest, Inc.
as 3:2012cv00197
Plaintiff:
Jane Martin
Defendant:
Cedar Fair Southwest, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. ACS/UBS RL EST SEC et al
as 1:2011cv00909
Plaintiff:
Essie Martin
Defendant:
ACS/UBS RL EST SEC , AES/Key Bank USA NA , Key Bank NA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Martin v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc.
as 5:2011cv00075
Plaintiff:
Mary E. Martin
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Butts v. Bayer CropScience, Inc., et al
as 4:2011cv03313
Defendant:
Bayer CropScience, Inc.,, 3M Business Product Sales, Inc., Pfizer, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Butts, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Martin v. American Standard, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv09734
Plaintiff:
Jack O. Martin
Defendant:
American Standard, Inc., Amsted Rail Company, Inc., General Electric Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
