Torts - Injury Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 21 - 30 of 107
Rogers-James et al v. Adamson et al
as 1:2020cv04766
Defendant: United States of America, John Doe, P.C. and David C. Adamson, M.D.
Plaintiff: Jacqueline Rogers-James and Ramona Rogers-Windsor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rogers v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv04452
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff: Felicia Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH et al v. CVS PHARMACY INC et al
as 5:2020cv00403
Defendant: CVS PHARMACY STORE #3874, ROGER WOOLWINE, CVS PHARMACY INC and others
Plaintiff: ROY SMITH and CONNIE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith et al v. CVS PHARMACY INC et al
as 1:2020cv00200
Defendant: CVS PHARMACY STORE #3874, Roger Woolwine, CVS PHARMACY INC and others
Plaintiff: Roy Smith and Connie Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rogers v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv03865
Defendant: C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Plaintiff: Steven Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harvey et al v. Renaissance Food Group, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv03881
Defendant: GHGA, LLC, Paul Bruns, Club Chef Southeast LLC and others
Plaintiff: Alton Harvey, Sr., Gloria Harvey and Roger Allan Kirschenbaum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Rogers v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03187
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff: Cheryl Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROGERS v. WALGREEN CO We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv00061
Plaintiff: WANDA ROGERS
Defendant: WALGREEN CO and DOES JOHN and CASEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cudahy v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01452
Plaintiff: Roger Cudahy
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nilsen v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00199
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff: Timothy Roger Nilsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?