Cases 21 - 30 of 52
Smith v. Organon USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00602
Plaintiff:
Meghan Smith
Defendant:
Organon USA, Inc., N.V. Organon, Schering Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shepard et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation
as 1:2012cv00143
Plaintiff:
Roy Edward Shepard and Shirley Shepard
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Alfa Laval, Inc. , Anvil International, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Viad Corp. , The William Powell Company , Grinnell LLC and others
Cross_defendant:
A.O. Smith Corporation, A.Y. McDonald, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SMITH et al v. C.R. BARD, INC.
as 1:2012cv03678
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA SMITH and JACK SMITH
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv03667
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Smith
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Smith v. Davol Inc et al
as 1:2011cv03644
Plaintiff:
Ronald Smith
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C R Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Latcher-Katz et al
as 1:2011cv00063
Plaintiff:
Deborah Smith and Ambrose Smith
Defendant:
Molly Latcher-Katz, RN , Oscar Herrara, RN , Ashley Brophy, CNA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03448
Plaintiff:
Susie Smith
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03311
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Smith
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pip
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03241
Plaintiff:
Malinda Kirkland Smith
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pip
Smith v. Davol Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03090
Plaintiff:
Wayne J. Smith and Wayne J. Smith
Defendant:
DAVOL INC. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
