Cases 21 - 30 of 349
BROWN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv01429
Plaintiff:
Joann Brown
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
RYALS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv01270
Plaintiff:
SAMANTHA RYALS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
KRAMER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv01038
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KRAMER
Not Classified By Court:
United States
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
ARAYA v. MITCHELL
as 1:2023cv00985
Plaintiff:
ISAAK SIMON ARAYA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, JUSTIN R. MITCHELL and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
WILSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv00344
Plaintiff:
TYNEISE WILSON
Not Classified By Court:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
ARAYA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv00145
Plaintiff:
ISAAK SIMON ARAYA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Auto Negligence
MCDANIEL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
KERRI MCDANIEL
Not Classified By Court:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
YANG v. ICS PROTECTIVE SERVICE et al
as 1:2022cv03836
Plaintiff:
JIN YANG
Defendant:
ICS PROTECTIVE SERVICE, EMBASSY OF THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF STATE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
WILSON v. CONKLIN
as 1:2022cv03639
Plaintiff:
VINCENT ELLIOT WILSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
BUIE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2022cv03501
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER L. BUIE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
