Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Brakken et al v. Walmart, Inc.
as 0:2022cv01802
Plaintiff:
Jessica Brakken, J.L. and M.B.
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Olson v. Walmart, Inc.
as 0:2021cv00183
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Alex J. Olson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Rudolph et al v. Walmart, Inc.
as 0:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
Sandra K Rudolph, David Rudolph and Sandra K. Rudolph
Defendant:
Walmart Inc. and Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
H.B., a minor, by and through Kathleen Bishop, his Mother and Natural Guardian v. Walmart Inc.
as 0:2021cv02535
Plaintiff:
H.B., a minor, by and through Kathleen Bishop, his Mother and Natural Guardian and H.B., a minor, by and through, Kathleen Bishop, his Mother and Natural Guardian
Defendant:
Walmart Inc. and Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chairez et al v. AW Distributing, Inc et al
as 0:2020cv01473
Plaintiff:
Natalie A. Chairez and Samantha G. Chairez
Defendant:
AW Distributing, Inc, Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, John Doe and others
Carlsen v. Walmart Inc.
as 0:2020cv00246
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David C. Carlsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rathke v. Walmart, Inc.
as 0:2019cv02783
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Howard F. Rathke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Elsing v. Walmart Inc.
as 0:2019cv00866
Plaintiff:
Mrs. Betty Lou Elsing
Defendant:
Walmart Inc. and Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Sage v. Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC et al
as 0:2018cv03170
Defendant:
Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC, Bridgestone/Firestone do Brasil Industrial e Comercio Ltda., Wal-Mart Associates, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Faith Sage
McCollum v. Walmart, Inc.
as 0:2018cv02641
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc. d/b/a Walmart Store 3233 and Walmart Inc.
Plaintiff:
Julie McCollum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
