Cases 21 - 30 of 85
Crittenden et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02220
Plaintiff:
Christopher Raney, Michael Whiddon, Donald Jones and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Jackson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02233
Plaintiff:
Michael Franz, Jason Mendez, Thad Tanaka and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Lane et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02235
Plaintiff:
Robert Thompson, Lucius Sykes, Derek Bradham and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Benjamin et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2019cv02170
Plaintiff:
Norman Francis, Trumaine Turner, Adam Faizi and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Wyatt et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02141
Plaintiff:
James Acuff, Jacob Ramsel, Aaron Brooks and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Ellis et al v. 3M Company et al DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 0:2019cv02099
Plaintiff:
William DeCarlo, Christopher Morgan, Scott Passmore and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Hicks et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02092
Plaintiff:
Curtis Hahn, Amorris Conley, Jonathan Stark and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Hughes et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02045
Plaintiff:
Jamall Rideaux, Brandon Dalcourt, Robert Phillips and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dixon et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02043
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones, Jordan Blackburn, Ricardo Dixon and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Gibbs et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2019cv02040
Plaintiff:
Richard Beagles, James Smith, Ozzie Jenkins and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
