Cases 31 - 40 of 78
LEVEY et al v. ACME MARKETS, INC.
as 2:2015cv08000
Plaintiff:
LISA LEVEY and GORDON LEVEY
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
COLLIAS v. ACME MARKETS, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv05892
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. COLLIAS
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC. , STATE AND LANSDOWNE ASSOCIATES, INC. and KRAVCO COMPANY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROESSEL v. ACME MARKETS, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv07369
Plaintiff:
CINDY ROESSEL
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC. , ABC CORP 1-10 and XYZ MAINTENANCE COMPANY 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GELFAND et al v. ACME MARKETS, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv05470
Plaintiff:
GALINA GELFAND and SIMON GELFAND
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC. and ASP REALTY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DISOMMA v. ACME MARKETS, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv07205
Plaintiff:
NOELLE DISOMMA
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC. , SUPERVALU, INC. , SUPERVALU HOLDINGS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PIERNIKOWSKI v. ACME MARKETS et al
as 2:2015cv05341
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE PIERNIKOWSKI
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS , ACME MARKETS, INC. and SHAW'S SUPERMARKET
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
PRICE v. ACME MARKETS, INC.
as 2:2015cv05195
Plaintiff:
COLLEEN PRICE
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HAMILTON v. ACME MARKET et al
as 2:2015cv04786
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY HAMILTON
Defendant:
ACME MARKET, ALBERTSON'S, LLC, ACME MARKETS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MOTTA v. ACME MARKETS, INC.
as 3:2015cv05322
Plaintiff:
TRACY MOTTA
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DUGAN et al v. ACME MARKETS INC. et al
as 1:2015cv05267
Plaintiff:
LAURA C. DUGAN and JIM DUGAN
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS INC. , MICHAEL NEISSER , JOHN DOE 1 THROUGH 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
