Cases 31 - 40 of 64
Inter Contiential Logistics, Inc. v. United Parcel Service Inc et al
as 2:2016cv01046
Plaintiff:
Inter Contiential Logistics, Inc.
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc and Adam Landers
Miscellaneou:
Ed Pulliam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Keville v. Adams et al
as 1:2015cv02753
Plaintiff:
STEVEN KEVILLE
Defendant:
Eric A. Adams and Averitt Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Keville v. Adams et al
as 2:2015cv02753
Plaintiff:
STEVEN KEVILLE
Defendant:
Eric A. Adams and Averitt Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams et al v. Robinson et al
as 1:2015cv00235
Plaintiff:
Nicole Adams and Arianna Steedley
Defendant:
Edward Ray Robinson and SK-MK, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simpson v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02283
Defendant:
Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. and Medtronic, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Adam Simpson
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Starrett et al v. Holter
as 2:2015cv00017
Plaintiff:
Mary V. Starrett , Ronald Adam Starrett , Addison P. Starrett and others
Defendant:
Jennifer L. Holter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Adams et al v. Martin Enterprises of the Carolinas, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00099
Plaintiff:
Jackson Lane Adams and Terri June Adams
Defendant:
Martin Enterprises of the Carolinas, Inc. and Jesse Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00331
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Adams v. Doe et al
as 3:2013cv01449
Plaintiff:
Carl Adams
Defendant:
John Doe and M. P. Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ziegler et al v. Ameridose, LLC
as 3:2013cv00918
Plaintiff:
Adam C. Ziegler and Sarah D. Ziegler
Defendant:
Ameridose, LLC, Medical Sales Management, Inc., Medical Sales Management SW, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
