Cases 31 - 40 of 123
ARMSTRONG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv55264
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PAUL ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker v. The United States
as 4:2021cv01153
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Walker
Defendant:
The United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
NORTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv52702
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PAUL NORTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARAKAL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv50604
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PAUL HARAKAL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KODACK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv42182
Plaintiff:
GERALD MICHAEL PAUL KODACK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KODACK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv41913
Plaintiff:
GERALD MICHAEL PAUL KODACK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv39102
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PAUL SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv36510
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PAUL THOMAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KODACK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv34207
Plaintiff:
GERALD MICHAEL PAUL KODACK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CATLIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv27615
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PAUL CATLIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
