Cases 31 - 36 of 36
IPPOLITO v. PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY
as 2:2009cv06263
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO IPPOLITO
Defendant:
PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
SIMOES v. PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2008cv02274
Plaintiff:
PAUL SIMOES
Defendant:
PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, AMTRAK and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION and CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
ThirdParty Defendant:
ABOVENET, INC., National Fiber Network, Inc. and J. FLETCHER CREAMER & SON, INC.
Cross Claimant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cross Defendant:
ABC CORPORATIONS 1-5, PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, AMTRAK and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PROTOPAPADAKIS v. PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, THE et al
as 2:2008cv00602
Plaintiff:
STAVROS PROTOPAPADAKIS
Defendant:
PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, THE and MAHER TERMINALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
NEWSHAM et al v. TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 3:2008cv00105
Plaintiff:
DAVID NEWSHAM and KATHLEEN M. NEWSHAM
Defendant:
TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
HINES-MALONEY v. THE PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2007cv06153
Plaintiff:
VENIDA HINES-MALONEY
Defendant:
THE PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, WARREN A. HODGES and ELRAC, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
HINES v. PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, THE et al
as 2:2007cv06154
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA HINES
Defendant:
PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, THE, WARREN A. HODGES and ELRAC, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
