Cases 31 - 40 of 141
Rose et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv06097
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Martha Rose and Benjamin Rose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kelley v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv04453
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rose Mary Kelley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ridders v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02331
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc
Plaintiff:
Rose Ridders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rose v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00494
Plaintiff:
James Rose
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bayless et al v. C.R. Bard Inc. Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv00631
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard Inc. Corporation
Plaintiff:
Rose Bayless and Bobbie Duane Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rose v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv05519
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Rose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Damore v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00440
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rose Mary Damore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2018md02846
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation, C.R. Bard, Inc., Davol, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Pauline R Currey, Gerald Lane, Abraham Furleiter and others
Interested Party:
David Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Allen et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02721
Plaintiff:
Brinda Bradley, Deatirce Digman, Brenda A. Woods and others
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rose v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv05160
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Rose
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
