Cases 41 - 50 of 78
DUGAN et al v. ACME MARKETS INC. et al
as 1:2015cv05267
Plaintiff:
LAURA C. DUGAN and JIM DUGAN
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS INC. , MICHAEL NEISSER , JOHN DOE 1 THROUGH 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TRAMMELL v. ACME SUPERMARKET et al
as 2:2015cv03169
Plaintiff:
BENITA TRAMMELL
Defendant:
ACME SUPERMARKET and ACME MARKETS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
GRUBB v. ACME MARKETS, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv03742
Plaintiff:
CECIL CLICK
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC. , SANDERSON FARMS, INC. , ALBERTSON'S LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
GAUGHAN v. ACME MARKETS, INC.
as 2:2015cv02734
Plaintiff:
THOMAS GAUGHAN
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TRAN v. ACME MARKETS, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv00563
Plaintiff:
HUYEN TRAN
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC. and SUPERVALU, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SCHOTT v. ACME MARKETS, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv00347
Plaintiff:
DENISE SCHOTT
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC. , ACME MARKETS , ALBERTSON'S, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JONES v. ACME MARKETS, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv06175
Plaintiff:
EDNA JONES
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC. , BAYVIEW ASSOCIATES , SANFORD SANDELMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KOCHMANSKY v. ACME MARKETS, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv05481
Plaintiff:
LISA KOCHMANSKY
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC. , PEPSI BEVERAGES COMPANY, PEPSICO, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCARPATO v. ACME MARKETS, INC.
as 2:2014cv05266
Plaintiff:
PAULA SCARPATO
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JUANITA PRIOLEAU et al v. ACME MARKETS, INC. et al
as 3:2014cv05606
Plaintiff:
JUANITA PRIOLEAU and JOSEPH PRIOLEAU
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC. and ABC CORPORATION 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
