Cases 41 - 50 of 75
Warner v. Garrity et al
as 2:2014cv00561
Plaintiff:
Valerie Y Warner
Defendant:
Mary Ann Garrity , John Doe and E Levine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Pitts v. General Electric Company, et al
as 2:2013cv01630
Plaintiff:
Kelsey Ann Pitts
Defendant:
General Electric Company , John Doe, XYZ Corporation 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McGovern v. United States of America
as 2:2013cv01387
Plaintiff:
Leslie Anne McGovern
Defendant:
United States of Amercia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Montgomery et v. United States of America
as 3:2013cv05508
Plaintiff:
John G Montgomery , Ann Montgomery , J. B. M. and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
McClure v. Tracy et al
as 3:2013cv05365
Plaintiff:
Jason R McClure
Defendant:
Dale L Tracy, Anne E Tracy and Inez C F/V
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Armas v. SuperValu Inc
as 2:2013cv03036
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Armas
Defendant:
SuperValu Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ledsome et al v. Holland America Line Inc et al
as 2:2012cv02242
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Ann Ledsome and Daniel George Ledsome
Defendant:
Holland America Line Inc, HAL Nederland, N. V. and Holland America Line NV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2012cv02241
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Ann Ledsome and Daniel George Ledsome
Defendant:
Holland America Line NV, Holland America Inc and HAL Nederland N V
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2012cv02229
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Ann Ledsome and Daniel George Ledsome
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 741 Shipping
:Fred-Francis et al v. Woods et al
as 2:2012cv02048
Plaintiff:
:Mark-Edward
Defendant:
Thomas M Woods, Jenny Anne Durkan, Andrew D Friedman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
