Cases 41 - 50 of 62
GREEN v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2010cv57903
Plaintiff:
LEONARD E GREEN
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
GREEN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv55324
Plaintiff:
LEONARD E. GREEN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
GREEN et al v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79143
Plaintiff:
WALTER E. GREEN and MRS. VERNELL GREEN
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC., GAF CORPORATION, H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GREEN v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv70677
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E. GREEN
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GREENE v. RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv65014
Plaintiff:
GEORGIA GREENE and JOHN E. GREENE
Defendant:
RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION, GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION, ASBESTOSPRAY CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GREEN V. UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
as 2:2010cv35522
Plaintiff:
JOHN E GREEN, JR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
GREEN et al v. NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv60023
Plaintiff:
TRIBIT E. GREEN and BARBARA A. GREEN
Defendant:
NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED , GAF CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Green v. Witten Technologies Inc
as 5:2008cv00451
Plaintiff:
Robert E Green
Defendant:
Witten Technologies Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GREEN v. A C AND S INC et al
as 5:2008cv92311
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E. GREEN
Defendant:
A C AND S INC, A C AND S INC, A C AND S INC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
GREEN v. A C & S INC et al
as 2:2008cv89325
Plaintiff:
LARRY E. GREEN
Defendant:
A C & S INC, A C & S INC, A C & S INC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
