Cases 41 - 50 of 176
Barksdale v. County of Macomb et al
as 4:2021cv12729
Plaintiff:
Shantanice Barksdale
Defendant:
County of Macomb, Michael Gorges, Amanda Backers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guinn v. DILLON et al
as 5:2021cv12542
Plaintiff:
Claybon Guinn
Defendant:
ROBERT EUGENE DILLON, United States of America, United States Department of Veterans Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
DOE v. Caro Community Schools
as 1:2021cv12322
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
Caro Community Schools
Crisp v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2021cv12314
Plaintiff:
Brenda Crisp
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Endo-Surgery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Landwehr v. ITW Food Equipment Group LLC et al
as 2:2021cv12283
Plaintiff:
Cathy Landwehr
Defendant:
ITW Food Equipment Group LLC, Hobart Sales and Service Inc. and John Doe Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson v. Mendards et al
as 5:2021cv12189
Plaintiff:
Linda Thompson
Defendant:
Mendards and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Backalukas v. Menard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv11792
Plaintiff:
Michael Backalukas
Defendant:
Menard, Inc., JOHN DOE and Menard, Inc. Doing business as Menards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARY HARRIS, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Ashley Harris, Deceased v. CORIZON HEALTH, INC., doing business as CORIZON OF MICHIGAN et al
as 2:2021cv10876
Defendant:
M.D. VINCENT PERNELL, CORIZON HEALTH, INC., doing business as CORIZON OF MICHIGAN, OFFICER HEAD and others
Plaintiff:
MARY HARRIS, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Ashley Harris, Deceased
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sumlin et al v. Mt. Morris Township et al
as 4:2021cv10597
Plaintiff:
Lamar Cordell, Alisa Sumlin, Chrissy Bingham and others
Defendant:
Mt. Morris Township, Detective Laurie Salem and Police Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
