Cases 41 - 50 of 493
ROEBUCK et al v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv67257
Plaintiff:
ROBERT C. ROEBUCK and SHIRLEY A. ROEBUCK
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS v. SEARS et al
as 2:2011cv04920
Plaintiff:
TOMANEL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
SEARS and SEARS ROEBUCK & CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHEPPARD et al v. CBS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv04408
Plaintiff:
LEROY SHEPPARD and CARA SHEPPARD
Defendant:
CBS CORPORATION , GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY , FOSTER-WHEELER CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
ROEBUCK v. VETERANS ADMINISTRATION et al
as 2:2011cv02966
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY ROEBUCK
Defendant:
VETERANS ADMINISTRATION and ELWYN CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SPENCER et al v. 84 LUMBER et al
as 2:2011cv01184
Plaintiff:
CORA SPENCER
Defendant:
84 LUMBER, WESTERN AUTO SUPPLY, WEIL MCLAIN and others
Movant:
UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WILLIS et al v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
as 2:2011cv00747
Plaintiff:
BARBARA WILLIS and ROBERT BRADFORD
Defendant:
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARIE v. SEARS AUTO REPAIR CENTER et al
as 5:2010cv06535
Plaintiff:
LAURA J. MARIE
Defendant:
SEARS AUTO REPAIR CENTER , SEARS HOLDING CORPORATION and SEARS & ROEBUCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MANZO et al v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO
as 5:2010cv06114
Plaintiff:
CAROL MANZO and THOMAS MANZO, JR.
Defendant:
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ROEBUCK v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv05304
Plaintiff:
GEORGE A. ROEBUCK
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE v. DANBY PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv01271
Plaintiff:
ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE
Defendant:
DANBY PRODUCTS, INC., SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO. , SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
