Cases 41 - 50 of 610
TWESTEN v. STICE et al
as 2:2017cv05084
Plaintiff:
RUTH TWESTEN
Defendant:
DARLENE STICE and MICHELLE STICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BARTOSIEWICZ v. SMITH et al
as 2:2017cv03723
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN BARTOSIEWICZ
Defendant:
GERALD R. SMITH, JR., DOROTHY C. SMITH, ROBERT M. BARTLOMIEJUSZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
A.W. et al v. PFIZER INC. et al
as 2:2017cv03525
Plaintiff:
A.W. and RUTH WALKER
Defendant:
PFIZER INC. , DOES and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HARRINGTON et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. et al
as 2:2017cv60024
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. HARRINGTON and RUTH HARRINGTON
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON et al. v. BAYER, CORP, et al.
as 2:2016cv03733
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE JOHNSON , LASHUNDRIA JOHNSON , LILLIAN JOHNSON and others
Defendant:
BAYER CORP. , BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC. , BAYER ESSURE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SABECKY et al v. KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC. et al
as 3:2016cv00890
Plaintiff:
RUTH SABECKY and WILLIAM SABECKY
Defendant:
Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. and KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HERSHBERGER et al v. GUSTOI et al
as 2:2016cv00369
Plaintiff:
CARL E. HERSHBERGER and RUTH M. HERSHBERGER
Defendant:
SERGHEI GUSTOI and HANDY TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROACH v. FERGUSON
as 2:2016cv01275
Plaintiff:
RUTH ROACH
Defendant:
EMILY FERGUSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SABECKY et al v. KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv00779
Plaintiff:
RUTH SABECKY and WILLIAM SABECKY
Defendant:
KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC. and KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Montero et al v. Gul et al
as 3:2016cv00087
Plaintiff:
Thomas Montero , Ariel Nunez , Ruth Nunez and others
Defendant:
Sobia Gul and Mohammad Khan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
