Cases 51 - 60 of 96
Reynolds et al v. Davol Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03354
Plaintiff:
William Reynolds and Joan Reynolds
Defendant:
DAVOL INC. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Folmar v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03195
Plaintiff:
William Keith Folmar
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pip
Williams v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03114
Plaintiff:
Ardel Williams, Ardel Williams and Ardel Williams
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pip
Williams v. Davol Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03098
Plaintiff:
Joyce Williams
Defendant:
DAVOL INC. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Taneja et al
as 1:2010cv00087
Plaintiff:
Crystal Brown
Defendant:
Charu Taneja and Roger Williams Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Fiedler et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03133
Plaintiff:
William H. Fiedler and Christina Fiedler
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Nelson v. A. W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2010cv00065
Plaintiff:
William T. Nelson, William T. Nelson, William T. Nelson and others
Defendant:
A. W. Chesterton Company, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Alco Valves (US), Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Williams-Clark v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03054
Plaintiff:
Dana Williams-Clark and Dana Williams-Clark
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pip
Williams v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03064
Plaintiff:
Beverly Ann Williams, Beverly Ann Williams, Beverly Ann Williams and others
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Brad, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pip
Denning v. Davol, Inc et al
as 1:2009cv00630
Plaintiff:
William K. Denning
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
