Cases 51 - 60 of 75
Schrant v. Flevares
as 4:2012cv04180
Plaintiff:
Dustin Schrant
Defendant:
George John Flevares
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Meidinger v. City of Rapid City et al
as 5:2012cv05064
Plaintiff:
Randall J. Meidinger
Defendant:
City of Rapid City , Peter Ragnone , Steve Allender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peonio et al v. Bradley et al
as 5:2012cv05038
Plaintiff:
John Peonio , Johnnie Peonio and Theresa Peonio
Defendant:
Elsie Bradley and Brenda Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Demos v. The United States et al
as 4:2012cv04096
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Defendant:
The United States and The State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Ohman v. Gearman et al
as 4:2012cv04076
Plaintiff:
Charles Douglas Ohman
Defendant:
Jason Gearman, Mandi Mowery, Michael Olson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Unertl v. Citrowske
as 4:2011cv04115
Plaintiff:
Karl R. Unertl
Defendant:
Glen John Citrowske
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tieszen v. Bastian et al
as 5:2011cv05053
Plaintiff:
Randy L. Tieszen
Defendant:
John Bastian, John Hunter, Don Friedel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Calvillo et al v. Siouxland Urology Associates P.C. et al
as 4:2011cv04033
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Calvillo , Nathan Calvillo , Joleen F. Delutri and others
Defendant:
Siouxland Urology Associates P.C. , Siouxland Urology Center, L.L.C. , John A. Wolpert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mendez v. Associated Milk Producers, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv04080
Plaintiff:
Orlando Mendez
Defendant:
Associated Milk Producers, Inc., Wisler Mennonite Church, Clair E. Weaver and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Behrle et al v. Larson et al
as 5:2010cv05038
Plaintiff:
William Behrle and Monica Frank
Defendant:
Jeanette Larson, Gary Larson, Sharon Woodle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
