Cases 51 - 57 of 57
VASKO v. TODD SHIPYARDS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv63998
Plaintiff:
WANUETA VASKO and WANUETA VASKO
Defendant:
TODD SHIPYARDS CORPORATION, TODD SHIPYARDS CORPORATION, TODD SHIPYARDS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
WILLIAMS v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv64013
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN ANN WILLIAMS, CAROLYN ANN WILLIAMS and YVETTE MCLEMORE-WILLIAMS
Defendant:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ROBERTSON v. TODD SHIPYARDS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv64000
Plaintiff:
SYBOL ROBERTSON and SYBOL ROBERTSON
Defendant:
TODD SHIPYARDS CORPORATION, TODD SHIPYARDS CORPORATION, TODD SHIPYARDS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
JONES v. TODD SHIPYARDS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv63999
Plaintiff:
ELLEREE JONES and ELLEREE JONES
Defendant:
TODD SHIPYARDS CORPORATION, TODD SHIPYARDS CORPORATION, TODD SHIPYARDS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
DUTTON v. TODD SHIPYARDS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv62916
Plaintiff:
RONALD DUTTON and RONALD DUTTON
Defendant:
TODD SHIPYARDS CORPORATION, GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, LOCKHEED SHIPBUILDING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BATTS et al v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv62927
Plaintiff:
JIM BATTS, JIM BATTS, GEORGE VOGEL and others
Defendant:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, LOCKHEED SHIPBUILDING COMPANY, LOCKHEED SHIPBUILDING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Koloen et al v. General Electric Company et al
as 3:2008cv04416
Plaintiff:
John Koloen, John Koloen, Ray Pearce, Jr. and others
Defendant:
General Electric Company, Northrop Grumman Ship Systems, Inc., Lockheed Shipbuilding Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
