Cases 61 - 70 of 86
MARTINS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILTY TRUST
as 2:2011cv48772
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO R. MARTINS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILTY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MARTIN et al v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv67487
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. MARTIN and NANCY R. MARTIN
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv13713
Plaintiff:
Emily R. Martin
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. , Bayer Schering Pharma AG , Barr Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARTIN v. A C & S, INC.
as 2:2010cv84575
Plaintiff:
DONALD R. MARTIN
Defendant:
A C & S, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARTIN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv41244
Plaintiff:
CHARLES R. MARTIN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
MARTIN et al v. CAIN et al
as 5:2010cv00803
Plaintiff:
JANELLE R. MARTIN, JANELLE R. MARTIN, MATTHEW MARTIN and others
Defendant:
ROBERT CAIN and CAIN COURIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
MARTIN v. A W CHESTERTON CO et al
as 2:2010cv61109
Plaintiff:
STELLA R. MARTIN
Defendant:
A W CHESTERTON CO, CBS CORPORATION, GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Counter Claimant:
OWENS ILLINOIS INC
Counter Defendant:
STELLA R. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MARTIN v. THE FLINTKOTE CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv60593
Plaintiff:
RENARD R. MARTIN
Defendant:
THE FLINTKOTE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MARTIN v. W.R. GRACE & COMPANY
as 2:2010cv60697
Plaintiff:
RENARD R. MARTIN
Defendant:
W.R. GRACE & COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Martin v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 2:2010cv00127
Plaintiff:
Donald R Martin, Donald R Martin and Donald R Martin
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
