Cases 61 - 70 of 418
SMALIS v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC
as 2:2020cv01235
Plaintiff:
ANASTASIOS SMALIS
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A, INC and HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FELICIANO et al v. OSHIRO et al
as 2:2020cv03861
Defendant:
JOHN DOE I, NIPPON EXPRESS U.S.A., INC., JOHN DOE II and others
Plaintiff:
JAIDYN DOUGLAS FELICIANO and DEBRA STEHL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KIRCHHOEFER v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
as 2:2020cv03579
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KIRCHHOEFER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FAUST et al v. TRICAM INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv01082
Plaintiff:
KIM FAUST and DALE FAUST
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. and TRICAM INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sheldrake v. THE TORO COMPANY et al
as 2:2020cv02537
Defendant:
THE TORO COMPANY, THE HOME DEPOT and HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Plaintiff:
Harry Sheldrake
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DINUNZIO v. TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION et al
as 2:2020cv01472
Defendant:
LEXUS, TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA, INC., TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
KAREN DINUNZIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl
Andrews et al v. Indiana Refrigerated Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00289
Defendant:
Indiana Refrigerated Services, Inc., Larry R. Handshoe, Plumrose U.S.A., Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Andrews and Jessica Andrews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
NAZIAN et al v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
as 2:2020cv00852
Plaintiff:
DENISE A. NAZIAN and ROBERT NAZIAN
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMPSON v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. et al
as 5:2020cv00625
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA THOMPSON
Defendant:
THE HOME DEPOT, INC. and HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MCCLELLAN v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
as 2:2020cv00145
Plaintiff:
MALIK MCCLELLAN
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
