Cases 71 - 80 of 377
Rita Hall v. Davol Inc et al
as 1:2010cv03084
Plaintiff:
Rita Hall and Rita Hall
Defendant:
Davol Inc, Bard Devices Inc, C R Bard Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Florian v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03109
Plaintiff:
Robert Florian and Robert Florian
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pip
Majid Kalhor et al v. Davol Inc et al
as 1:2010cv03086
Plaintiff:
Majid Kalhor, Majid Kalhor, Katherine Kalhor and others
Defendant:
Davol Inc, Bard Devices Inc, C R Bard Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Larson v. Davol Inc et al
as 1:2010cv03081
Plaintiff:
Laveta Larson, Laveta Larson and Laveta Larson
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C R Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Greer et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03080
Plaintiff:
Douglas H Greer and Betty Greer
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., Davol, Inc., C R Bard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cline v. Davol Inc et al
as 1:2010cv03082
Plaintiff:
Barbara Cline, Barbara Cline and Barbara Cline
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C R Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Canter v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03051
Plaintiff:
Katrina Canter and Katrina Canter
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pip
Hill v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03056
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Hill and Kimberly Hill
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pip
Hadley v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03052
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Hadley and Jonathon Hadley
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pip
Stringer v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03055
Plaintiff:
John Stringer and John Stringer
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pip
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
