Cases 71 - 79 of 79
VAN DE WAL v. NIKE INC. et al
as 2:2009cv04937
Plaintiff:
GERARD VAN DE WAL
Defendant:
NIKE INC., NIKE USA, INC., NIKE RETAIL SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MICKENS et al v. RODELANDER et al
as 2:2009cv04249
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY MICKENS, MARY ELLEN MICKENS and DANTE MICKENS
Defendant:
TERRY RODELANDER, D & D SEXTON INC., ABC CORP. 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
MCKIM v. J.W. MARRIOTT, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv01107
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY MCKIM
Defendant:
J.W. MARRIOTT, INC., MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., JOHN DOES 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MOFFITT et al v. HARDRICK et al
as 1:2008cv04488
Plaintiff:
JOANNE MOFFITT and JAMES MOFFITT
Defendant:
GREGORY N. HARDRICK, JR, MAY TRUCKING COMPANY and JOHN DOE 1-3
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LASCARI v. CORREA et al
as 2:2008cv02700
Plaintiff:
SANDRA L. LASCARI
Defendant:
FELIERTO CORREA, WHEELS, INC., LABORATORY CORP. OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
WALKER v. ATLANTIC PALACE CONDO ASSOCIATION, INC. et al
as 1:2008cv02419
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA WALKER
Defendant:
ATLANTIC PALACE CONDO ASSOCIATION, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-3
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ROBBINS et al v. TIBURON CAPITAL, LLC et al
as 3:2008cv00273
Plaintiff:
STEVEN ROBBINS and LAURIE ROBBINS
Defendant:
TIBURON CAPITAL, LLC, NCM MANAGEMENT, LTD., JOHN DOES 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MORANO v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT et al
as 2:2007cv02407
Plaintiff:
FRANK MORANO
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT, JOHN DOE 1-3 and JOHN DOE 1-3
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
HAJI v. AMB PROPERTY CORP. et al
as 2:2007cv01653
Plaintiff:
NASIR HAJI
Defendant:
AMB PROPERTY CORP., CHEMLUMINA, JOHN DOES 1 - 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
