Cases 71 - 80 of 916
Cullen et al v. Phillip et al
as 3:2015cv00140
Plaintiff:
James P. Cullen, III and Evelyn Cullen
Defendant:
Saul J. Phillip and Dabin Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364
Grosklos v. York Railway Company
as 1:2015cv00127
Plaintiff:
Phillip C. Grosklos
Defendant:
York Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
CURCIO et al v. P.E. SALES, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv07091
Plaintiff:
DENISE CURCIO and KENNETH CURCIO
Defendant:
P.E. SALES, INC. and PHILLIP BAUMGEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fossett et al v. Phillip et al
as 3:2014cv02019
Plaintiff:
John Fossett and Joanne Fossett
Defendant:
Saul J. Phillip and Dabin Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. HOLDEN
as 2:2014cv05568
Plaintiff:
ROMEO JOHNSON
Defendant:
PHILLIP HOLDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HILL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2014cv05319
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP HILL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
NIXON v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2014cv03499
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP NIXON
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PHILLIPS v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2014cv03589
Plaintiff:
ROBINSON PHILLIPS
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FOWLER et al v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK) et al
as 2:2014cv03122
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP FOWLER and DANIELLE FOWLER
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK) and WHITING CORPORATION
Cross_claimant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cross_defendant:
WHITING CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
PHILLIPS v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2014cv02623
Plaintiff:
RANDY DAVIS PHILLIPS, JR.
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, NFL PROPERTIES, LLC, RIDDELL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
