Cases 1 - 10 of 16
DHLNH, LLC v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 251 et al
as 1:2018cv00281
Plaintiff:
DHLNH, LLC
Defendant:
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 251 , Mathew Maini , Carl Ernest and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Peterson v. Flinkfelt et al
as 1:2017cv00414
Plaintiff:
Arthur H Peterson
Defendant:
Gabriel H Flinkfelt and Glyn J Thompson
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Smith v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv00257
Plaintiff:
Arthur D Smith
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corporation and Stryker Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Geigus v. Bergstresser et al
as 1:2014cv00318
Plaintiff:
Gloria J. Geigus
Defendant:
James Bergstresser, Judith Bergstresser, Arthur Bernier and others
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409
White v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv03762
Plaintiff:
Arthur White
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pip
Trayal et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv03690
Plaintiff:
Arthur Trayal , Betty Gene Briggs , Arthur Earl Trayal, Jr and others
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
D'Amario, III v. Mendes et al
as 1:2010cv00280
Plaintiff:
Arthur D'Amario, III
Defendant:
Natalia Mendes and Debra Ann Sellers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Billingslea et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02942
Plaintiff:
Debra Billingslea and Arthur Billingslea
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Cobb v. United States of America et al
as 1:2009cv00388
Plaintiff:
Arthur Cobb, Arthur Cobb and Arthur Cobb
Defendant:
United States of America, Curtis E. Doberstein, MD, University Neurosurgery, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
EPERT et al v. DAVOL INC. et al
as 1:2008cv02570
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR RONALD EPERT and MELANIE S. EPERT
Defendant:
DAVOL INC. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
